May 16, 2018, 11:18 AM ET

Gina Haspel wins approval from Senate Intel Committee


Trump’s pick to be the next CIA director, Gina Haspel, won approval from the Senate Intelligence Committee Wednesday morning, receiving a "favorable recommendation" in a 10-5 vote.

Interested in Trump Administration?

Add Trump Administration as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Trump Administration news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Add Interest

The committee voted behind closed doors Wednesday morning.

The positive review sets her up for a final vote before the full Senate in the coming days. She is all but assured to win Senate confirmation and become the first woman to lead the Central Intelligence Agency.

Haspel currently has the support of the majority of Republicans and endorsements from five Democrats.

The committee's chairman gave her a positive public endorsement after the vote.

“Gina Haspel is the most qualified person the President could choose to lead the CIA and the most prepared nominee in the 70 year history of the Agency,” Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., said in a statement. “She has acted morally, ethically, and legally, over a distinguished 30-year career and is the right person to lead the Agency into an uncertain and challenging future. I’m pleased to see the Committee favorably report her nomination to the full Senate, and I look forward to her swift confirmation.”

Two of the committee's seven Democrats are supporting Haspel, including Virginia's Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the panel.

The favorable recommendation comes after Haspel told Congress, in a letter sent to Warner on Monday, that she now feels the spy agency should not have employed the harsh interrogations program used on al Qaeda detainees that included waterboarding.

In the letter, Haspel also acknowledged that it was "a mistake" for the CIA not to have briefed Congress about the program at its inception.

"With the benefit of hindsight and my experience as a senior agency leader, the enhanced interrogation program is not one the CIA should have undertaken," she wrote in the letter to Warner.

"While I won't condemn those that made these hard calls, and I have noted the valuable intelligence collected, the program ultimately did damage to our officers and our standing in the world," Haspel continued.

She had not expressed those feelings publicly, during her contentious confirmation hearing last week. Haspel told the committee that she would not resurrect the agency's controversial rendition, detainee, and interrogation program if she became CIA director, but went no further.

"I don't believe that torture works," she told the committee, but stopped short of saying whether the interrogation program was "immoral" or should have been carried out.

After the vote on Wednesday, many Democrats expressed concern about Haspel's nomination.

"Gina Haspel and the CIA have committed one of the most blatant abuses of power in recent history, aided and abetted by a total failure of Congressional oversight," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oreg., said in a statement Wednesday. "I have very grave concerns about Ms. Haspel and believe her background makes her unsuitable to be CIA director."

Currently serving as the agency's deputy director, Haspel is well-regarded within the agency. She joined the CIA in 1985 and has held a series of high-ranking positions at the intelligence agency throughout her lengthy career, including senior leadership positions within the agency's National Clandestine Service, which oversees the agency's spy operations overseas and its most covert operations programs.

At the request of Congress, the CIA has declassified documents shedding light on Haspel's career in covert operations, particularly in her reported role at the agency's "black site" in Thailand.

The committee's report on the CIA's rendition program said senior al Qaeda operatives Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were detained at that location.

The report said that while at the black site in Thailand in 2002, Zubaydah was subjected to the controversial practice of waterboarding 83 times and to other "stress" techniques such as being slammed against walls, deprived of sleep and placed in a coffin-sized box for up to 226 hours.

Two Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and John McCain of Arizona, are opposed to Haspel's nomination. McCain is not expected to be in Washington for Haspel's confirmation vote.

In March, McCain noted that Haspel's CIA career "has intersected with the program of so-called 'enhanced interrogation techniques' on a number of occasions."

"The torture of detainees in U.S. custody during the last decade was one of the darkest chapters in American history," McCain said in a statement. "Ms. Haspel needs to explain the nature and extent of her involvement in the CIA's interrogation program during the confirmation process."

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake, McCain's Arizona colleague, has said he's undecided.

News - Gina Haspel wins approval from Senate Intel Committee

RRelated Posts


  • Michael Dennis

    As usual, McCain has shown his inabliltiy to be decisive nor take into account the circumstances the nation was in after the bombing of 911 when Haskell first came to the FBI. Sad to see his mental abilities so dimmed by illness and age.

  • Lawrence Wilson

    For this broad to get confirmed, she must have had much the same ammo on these Senators as J. Edgar did. God but the stench in DC is getting rank.

  • The Truth

    Dianne Feinstein, Ron Wyden of Oregon, Martin Heinrich and Angus King all voted against Gina Haspel but for John Brennan

    So they were for torture before they were against it?

    Are they afraid of placing women in positions of power?

    Or are they suffering from severe cases of TDS?

  • Dominic

    Haspel will make an exemplary CIA Director and continue Pompeo's work of cleaning up another politically corrupted federal agency after eight years of Marxist infestation.

    THIS is what the left fears.

    The Deep State will be damaged if not dismantled with the installation of actual patriots at the helm of our federal agencies instead of radical leftist political operatives, which is all Dear Leader Barry ever gave us.

  • YouMayBanMeButYouCan'tBanIdeas

    “She has acted morally, ethically, and legally, over a distinguished 30-year career"

    So torture was moral, ethical and legal. It truly saddens me to behold just how low America has fallen under Trump.

  • jon rhodes

    We Americans are always insisting that we take the high road and that other countries violate human rights. And then our elected representatives confirm a person who has been directly involved with torture of human beings. What has happened to us? American "exceptionalism?"
    Remember how loud we used to complain about the way our prisoners of war were treated by the Japanese, Viet Cong and others. We are now members of that despicable club.

  • Colinalcarz

    After having denounced the harsh interrogation practices for which she is most associated, Haspel fell short of promising she would not agree to use them again. The committee managed to get her denunciation on record but not any agreement to limit such actions going forward. In the end, McCain’s vote would not have made a difference.

  • Bernard Sandan

    You see John McCain, your words makes no difference, the most important is concentrate on your health and your salvation to Christ and not about the White house and who should not attend on your funeral, they are useless.

  • Ashley

    Congratulations! Well qualified for the position.

  • cassyJ

    I can't figure out, does she have teeth in her mouth or not?

  • spacerome

    The committee’s approval for Gina Haspel. And,
    Jared Kushner's smile, Ivanka Trump’s smile when Palestinians being shot and killed.

    These make me want to vomit, and these are weighing on my mind.


  • Cleo

    She's the right one to lead the agency. The 'enhanced interrogations' were authorized straight from the White House, so it didn't rest on her shoulders. She says she will never allow it again. I believe her.

  • Fo Gordon

    Why does the right lie so pathetically. This woman is a war criminal. She has not a shred of compassion! And, she won't take responsibility for her actions and is criminal enough to write an order against orders from her superiors to destroy evidence!

  • donnieboy64

    so i guess she totally blew off rand paul.

  • rkb555

    The committee voted behind closed doors Wednesday morning.

    What's the pt of that? Everyone will know the vote anyhow.

  • bibleexpert

    The favorable recommendation comes after Haspel told Congress, in a letter sent to Warner on Monday, that she now feels the spy agency should not have employed the harsh interrogations program used on al Qaeda detainees that included waterboarding.

    When I told the judge that I shouldn't have robbed all those banks and am sorry I did, he offered me a job as the chief of police.

  • Prophet With Honor

    Moving forward now...

  • TS13

    Another dark day for this country......