Sep 14, 2018, 7:19 PM ET

Kavanaugh denies high school assault allegation

#

President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Friday strongly denied newly-surfaced allegations from a woman who, according to the New Yorker, is claiming he “attempted to force himself on her” during a party when they were both in high school in the early 1980s.

Interested in Supreme Court?

Add Supreme Court as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Add Interest

“I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation," Kavanaugh said in a statement released by the White House Friday. "I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

The New Yorker on Friday reported details of the allegations made by the woman contained in a letter that the magazine said was given to the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Dianne Feinstein. The magazine said the woman has declined to reveal her identity.

According to the New Yorker, she claims that “during the party, Kavanaugh held her down and that attempted to force himself on her.”

The magazine reported the allegation in the letter was “that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand.”

The account said, “she was able to free herself.”

The existence of the letter was first reported by the online news outlet, The Intercept, on Wednesday. The New York Times reported Thursday that the letter was regarding “possible sexual misconduct” from when Kavanaugh was in high school.

ABC News has not confirmed details of the letter’s contents or seen the letter.

On Thursday, Feinstein said she had received "information" regarding Kavanaugh and has passed it on to the FBI.

"I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities," Feinstein said in a statement Thursday.

According to a source cited by the New Yorker, Feinstein learned of the alleged incident in July and while her staff members mentioned it to other Democratic lawmakers, they did not share the letter with them. The allegation was not raised at any time during the judge's confirmation hearings.

The FBI confirmed it had received the letter but indicated it was not immediately pursuing the allegations.

ABC News has reached out to Debra Katz, a lawyer identified by Buzzfeed as counsel to the woman who has come forward with the allegation but received no response.

"There's nothing to say," Katz told BuzzFeed News Wednesday.

On Friday, Feinstein's office defended the senator's decision to send the letter to the FBI in the face of criticism that she did not come forward with the allegations sooner.

"Senator Feinstein was given information about Judge Kavanaugh through a third party. The Senator took these allegations seriously and believed they should be public. However, the woman in question made it clear she did not want this information to be public. It is critical in matters of sexual misconduct to protect the identity of the victim when they wish to remain anonymous, and the senator did so in this case," a spokesperson for the senator said.

Senate Republicans on Friday released a letter from 65 women who knew Kavanaugh during his high school years vouching for his character.

"We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983. For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect," the women said in the letter sent Friday to Senate Judiciary leaders.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, is pushing ahead with plans for a committee vote on Kavanaugh's nomination next Thursday. "Anonymous allegations are not going to change the chairman’s plans for a vote on Thursday," a top committee Republican aide tells Cindy Smith.

PHOTO: Sen. Dianne Feinstein listens to an aide during a markup hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sept. 13, 2018, on Capitol Hill.Alex Wong/Getty Images
Sen. Dianne Feinstein listens to an aide during a markup hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sept. 13, 2018, on Capitol Hill.

As to whether Republicans knew about the allegation in advance and had the letter from the 65 Kavanaugh high school contemporaries "in the can," Grassley's office said no. One of Kavanaugh's law clerks spearheaded the effort Thursday and sent the letter to Grassley's office Friday, the aide said.

In its initial story, The Intercept reported the letter was said to have been written by someone affiliated with Stanford University. It was originally sent to Rep. Anna Eshoo, who represents California's 14th district, according to several media reports. Eshoo then referred the letter to Feinstein.

Eshoo's staff declined to comment on the letter, saying they did not discuss constituent casework.

Feinstein has not shared details about the letter beyond her statement Thursday, and before this week, no other senators on the Judiciary Committee had been permitted to see it, according to reports.

ABC News has not confirmed the Intercept's reporting.

The FBI confirmed it had received the information "on the night of September 12." A spokesperson added, "we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh's background file, as per the standard process."

PHOTO: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley presides over the third day of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaughs confirmation hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, Sept. 6, 2018, in Washington.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley presides over the third day of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, Sept. 6, 2018, in Washington.

On Thursday, Grassley told reporters he had not seen the letter.

“All I know is what I read in some two or three sentences in some report that came out overnight, and since I don't know anything more about it then what I read, that's all I can say at this point,” Grassley said.

He went on: “All I know is what I read and I wouldn't make any judgment of it until I had more information.”

Separately, Grassley’s spokesperson George Hartmann told ABC News that Grassley is “respecting the request for confidentiality.”

“There’s no plan to change the committee’s consideration of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination,” Hartmann said in a statement.

The White House also weighed in with a statement on Thursday.

“Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators—including with Senator Feinstein—sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his confirmation has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new ‘information’ about him," White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec said in a statement.

"Throughout 25 years of public service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has thoroughly and repeatedly vetted Judge Kavanaugh, dating back to 1993, for some of the most highly sensitive roles. He has served in the Office of Independent Counsel, the White House, and on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, all before his nomination earlier this year to serve as Associate Justice on the Supreme Court," she said.

"Senator Schumer promised to ‘oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have,’ and it appears he is delivering with this 11th-hour attempt to delay his confirmation,” Kupec said.

ABC News' Devin Dwyer, Ben Siegel and Mike Levine contributed to this report.

News - Kavanaugh denies high school assault allegation

RRelated Posts

CComments

  • Thomas

    It would be nice if there was any evidence or proof that supports this claim.

  • Onetaxpayer

    Not bad for a kid that went to a boys high school for girls/women to know him for 35 years.

  • badhairpiece

    Trumpeteers are programmed to "deny".

  • hound

    Due process should require an investigation by some agency as part of the vetting process. If it is not true, he would be cleared.

  • Robert Marley

    kobrak...you're right (my error)...the media has ZERO standards now-a-days. Thanks for correcting me. MAGA! (smile)

  • Robert Marley

    Tkirk, guess what???? "We" the people don't go by YOUR book. Too bad for you & your book huh?

  • Tkirk

    I have problems with the push to get Kavanaugh approved. The Republicans keep cramming candidates onto the Supreme Court. The last one they changed the rules and he became the 1st Justice that doesn't have at least 60 votes...so in my book he's Illegal...you can't change the rules of the game and then claim a win. Ex Republican that's had enough...no longer my party.

  • kobrakai6868

    So, if I am to understand correctly, it is the position of Republicans that, as citizens, it is our duty to vet evidence of any possible criminal act that happens to come into our possession and, you know, decide for ourselves when information is actionable and worthy of forwarding onto law enforcement.. After all, we are all experts in criminal law, and we don't want to have our Federal Bureau of Investigation which exists to investigate crime getting all bogged down in investigating crime, do we?

  • Robert Marley

    TO: Mark Richard

    Mark, the best post I have seen here in months. You nailed it but the libs will refuse to see the hypocrisy of the media standards.. Anyway, good post...thanks.

  • annalewis

    What man would admit to something like that .. Just like the hair on the Coke can .

  • FasterBadger

    Even if the allegations are true, the timing of this is quite suspicious.

  • PerchLady

    From high school?? Aw, c'mon. What kid in high school didn't get a little fresh at one time or another? If the woman didn't want it to become public, why even bring it up?

  • ItsOnlyaFleshWound

    Wait. WHAT was that sound?? Oh Yeah, it was the sound of the Democrats' "HAIL MARY" pass going by!!! Too LITTLE & too LATE!!

  • RZC

    This guy has already been caught telling little white lies
    In the mean time. and just like his mentor

    (CNN)The number almost hits you in the face: Less than one in three people in the new CNN-SSRS poll believe that President Donald Trump is honest and trustworthy.
    Two-thirds of the country don't think you can trust this president! They don't think he is honest! That's a remarkable finding.
    It's also virtually the exact same way that voters judged Trump on the question of being honest and trustworthy on November 8, 2016 -- the day he was elected president.

  • Tegbessou Géléhéso

    So Senator Dianne Feinstein brings to the table an unsubstantiated allegation concerning an assault that was not reported when it allegedly occurred 30 years. No witnesses, the victims won't come forward and Kavanaugh denies it... well I say send him to prison and throw away the key. Want to be a Supreme Court Justice? then Justice this...

  • WRW

    Feinstein had this info since July and should have submitted it then to the FBI and questioned Kavanaugh privately or in closed session. To wait until this Wednesday to submit it is negligent and fishy.